Research article 3 min read
Medically reviewed

Omnilux vs CurrentBody Skin: Full Head-to-Head Comparison

Omnilux Contour Face vs CurrentBody Series 2 — head-to-head on LEDs, wavelengths (including CurrentBody's exclusive 1072nm), fit, and clinical results. Which mask wins for anti-aging in 2026?

MH
Dr. Maya Hollander, PhD
Photobiomodulation researcher · Medical reviewer
● Reviewed
9 Apr 2026

Omnilux and CurrentBody Skin are the two LED face masks that come up in every serious comparison. Both are FDA-cleared. Both use 633nm red and 830nm near-infrared. Both claim dermatologist approval and clinical evidence. Both cost £300–470.

The differences are real but subtle, and choosing the wrong one is a common £400 mistake. This comparison breaks it down without the marketing spin.

Affiliate disclosure: This page contains affiliate links. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.

At a Glance

FeatureOmnilux Contour FaceCurrentBody Skin Series 2
LED count132236
Red wavelength633 nm633 nm
Near-infrared830 nm830 nm
Deep NIRNone1072 nm
CoverageFace onlyFace + chin + neck
Session time10 min10 min
FDA clearedYesYes
FlexibilitySoft silicone — very flexibleSemi-rigid — less flexible
Price~£300–350~£370–470

Bottom line up front: CurrentBody offers more wavelengths and wider coverage. Omnilux offers better comfort and a longer clinical heritage. For most users focused purely on anti-ageing, Omnilux is the safer long-term bet. For anyone with neck and chin concerns, CurrentBody’s extended coverage is a meaningful advantage.

The Wavelength Difference: Does 1072nm Matter?

This is the headline difference and the most misunderstood one.

Both masks share 633nm and 830nm — the two wavelengths with the strongest published anti-ageing evidence. Omnilux stops there. CurrentBody adds a third: 1072nm deep near-infrared.

1072nm penetrates deeper than 830nm, reaching subcutaneous tissue and the deeper dermis. The clinical rationale is enhanced collagen remodelling at a depth that 830nm can’t consistently reach. CurrentBody commissioned an independent clinical trial of the Series 2 — results showed a 57% increase in skin plumpness and a 27% improvement in brightness after eight weeks.

However, the majority of published LED therapy research specifically for anti-ageing uses 633nm and 830nm. The 1072nm evidence base is thinner. You’re getting a meaningful extra wavelength, but one backed by one high-quality device trial, not decades of independent research.

Verdict: If you want the gold-standard evidence base, Omnilux’s two wavelengths are better supported. If you want the broadest wavelength coverage currently available in a home mask, CurrentBody wins.

LED Count and Coverage

CurrentBody’s 236 LEDs vs Omnilux’s 132 may sound like an obvious win for CurrentBody, but context matters.

The critical metric is irradiance at skin surface — the actual mW/cm² landing on your skin — not raw LED count. A mask with 236 lower-intensity LEDs can deliver the same or less irradiance than 132 higher-intensity LEDs, depending on LED specifications.

Omnilux’s measured irradiance is approximately 28 mW/cm². CurrentBody does not publish independent irradiance data. This is a meaningful gap in transparency.

What CurrentBody’s higher LED count does deliver is coverage area. The Series 2 covers the chin and extends toward the neck — areas that show ageing clearly but that Omnilux misses. If jawline and neck are priorities, this is a legitimate advantage.

Fit and Comfort

This is where user reviews diverge consistently.

Omnilux uses soft, flexible medical-grade silicone with a strap system. The mask moulds easily to most face shapes. The strap system is the most common complaint — it can be fiddly, and some users find it doesn’t hold the mask close enough to the skin across the cheeks.

CurrentBody uses a firmer construction. It holds its shape better independently, which some users prefer. But the rigidity means it fits fewer face shapes equally well. Reviewers with narrower faces and narrower noses report gaps between the mask and skin — a meaningful problem since LED effectiveness drops sharply with distance.

Verdict: Omnilux fits a wider range of face shapes. CurrentBody’s rigid construction is more comfortable for users it fits well, but less forgiving for those it doesn’t.

Clinical Evidence

Omnilux

Omnilux has manufactured clinical LED devices used in hospitals and dermatology clinics for over 20 years. The Contour Face is based on the same LED technology used in those clinical systems, and the brand has over 40 peer-reviewed studies supporting the efficacy of its wavelength choices.

The Omnilux-specific clinical data shows 98% of participants reported firmer skin, 95% reported brighter skin after six weeks.

CurrentBody Skin Series 2

CurrentBody commissioned an independent (non-brand-funded) randomised controlled trial of the Series 2. Results: 57% increase in skin plumpness, 27% improvement in brightness after eight weeks. This is a strong, credible result — and the independent trial design is a mark of transparency that many competitors don’t match.

The limitation is fewer studies and a shorter history compared to Omnilux. CurrentBody cannot point to 20 years of hospital use.

Verdict: Omnilux has the deeper heritage and broader literature. CurrentBody has strong recent independent data. Both are well-evidenced; neither claim is marketing fiction.

Price

MaskUK Price (approx.)
Omnilux Contour Face£300–350
CurrentBody Skin Series 2£370–470

Both prices move significantly with sales. CurrentBody runs frequent promotional pricing. Check current pricing before buying — the gap often narrows or reverses temporarily.

Who Should Buy Omnilux

  • Users who prioritise comfort and flexible fit above all else
  • Anyone focused strictly on anti-ageing using the best-evidenced wavelength combination (633nm + 830nm)
  • Users with narrower faces or pronounced noses where rigid masks don’t seal well
  • Anyone who wants 20+ years of clinical heritage behind their device

Buy Omnilux Contour Face on Amazon →{rel=“nofollow sponsored noopener noreferrer” target=“_blank”}

Who Should Buy CurrentBody Skin Series 2

  • Users who want chin and neck coverage in addition to the face
  • Anyone who wants the broadest wavelength spread (633 + 830 + 1072nm)
  • Users who prefer a mask that holds its shape rather than relying on a strap system
  • Anyone who finds the CurrentBody price comparable during a sale

Buy CurrentBody Skin Series 2 on Amazon →{rel=“nofollow sponsored noopener noreferrer” target=“_blank”}

The Honest Verdict

For a straightforward anti-ageing LED mask, Omnilux is the safer default. The combination of clinical heritage, transparent irradiance data, flexible fit, and the most-studied wavelength pairing makes it easier to recommend without caveats.

CurrentBody is not the wrong choice — particularly if chin and neck coverage matters to you, or if you want the extra depth of 1072nm. But it’s harder to recommend without seeing independent irradiance verification, and the rigid fit is a meaningful risk for certain face shapes.

If you’re torn: Omnilux fits more people well; CurrentBody offers more features. Try both if a return policy allows it.


This comparison is editorially independent. Prices accurate at time of writing. See our Omnilux Contour Face full review for the complete breakdown.

Related topics
omnilux vs currentbody·currentbody vs omnilux·omnilux contour face vs currentbody·best led face mask 2026

Find the right device

Compare 20+ red light therapy devices by wavelength, irradiance, and value.

Compare devices
Free guide

Evidence-based RLT updates

No hype, just research. New studies, protocol updates, and device test results in your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.